Showing posts with label writing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label writing. Show all posts

Monday, August 3, 2009

The Waiting is the Hardest Part... Except for the Unemployment. And the Rejection.

One of the nicest letters I ever got was a rejection letter.

And by "nicest", I don't just mean how it was phrased. I mean it was sincerely one of the most thoughtful, restore-my-faith-in-humanity missives it was ever my pleasure to receive.

So much so that, even after more than a decade, I still think of it fondly.

The letter in question notified me in simple, straightforward terms that despite the fact that I had auditioned for them, the Texas Shakespeare Festival would not be requiring my services as an actor for their upcoming season.

What made the letter so nice was the fact that it's pretty much the only letter like it I can ever remember getting. You know the old phrase "Don't call us, we'll call you?" Well, it's pretty much the way things work after an audition, and for good reason. A producer has very little motivation to let you know that they've cast someone else, because a) they might not work out, and they might want to cast you later on down the line, and b) who wants to tell anyone bad news, much less an emotionally needy bucket of HIREMEHIREMEHIREME desperation like most actors?

I can say, though, that for most of us (emotionally needy and desperate though we may be), we'd love to hear that we didn't get the job. Not nearly as much as that we did, but much more than not hearing anything at all. Certainty may be disappointing, but it's still certainty.

Actors are, by nature, optimistic creatures, at least when it comes to issues of our own talent. If we weren't, we wouldn't be actors; it's very hard to get a human being to step out onstage in front of several hundred people if they don't think it will go well. Surface insecurities and perfectionism aside, we tend to think, deep down, that it will go very well indeed.

"You bitches have no idea how hard I'm about to rock your world."

So, no matter how many times reality tells us otherwise, unless it's the kind of massive screwup where you tripped and spilled scalding tea on the director, forgot your entire monologue, and then peed yourself (and those do happen), actors leave every audition secure in the knowledge that the role is ours.

And then we wait.

And wait.

And wait.

"...but the callback was only eight months ago!"

And then nine times out of ten (if we're lucky!) nobody calls.

Someone I know (who works in a more normative industry) once spent several months without a job. Every job she applied for and didn't get was crushing rejection; a referendum on her very worth as a human being. I understood her frustration, but it stood in marked contrast to the kind of... disassociative attitude I've had to develop about employment.

See, when you're applying for new jobs not every few years, or every few months, or every few days even, but constantly, and you're only booking one in ten or twenty or thirty, you learn to forget you even applied. I have a rule with my parents (who, god bless 'em, are fervently supportive of my artistic and professional success) that they were only allowed to ask me about a given audition once, and that if I said "It went fine," that meant I wasn't going to say a damn thing more on the matter. Because if I did, that meant I would think about it, which would mean I would start to consider my odds, which means I would be mentally sitting by the phone waiting for a call like a girl left home from the prom.

Which kinda... wears on you, after a while.

So you learn to toss every audition out the window after it's done. You learn not to want it one second after you've stepped out the door. It's a kind of nasty little mindfuck, in some ways, but it saves your ego, and your sanity, and ultimately is a more realistic approach to things, because it's very seldom ever personal. Once you reach a certain level of talent and skill -- once you "clear the bar", as it were -- casting comes down to a whole lot of things beyond your control. You can kinda pick your reason, because most of the time you'll never know why you weren't cast.

My favorite is I look a little too much like the director's devastatingly handsome ex-boyfriend who broke their heart forever, and subconsciously they just couldn't deal with it.

Every once in a while, though, one of those auditions comes along that you can't help falling in love with, a little. That you can't help wanting. God, do I hate them.

Professionally, it's been a tough stretch for me, as it has for many people. It's been a year since I set foot on a stage. I had two of those kind of "I can't help falling in love" opportunities on my plate recently (one as an actor, one as a playwright) , and the sound of the phone not ringing became thuddingly obvious this past week on both of them. It's at times like these I wonder why I chose a career which came with periodic existential crises instead of a 401K.

As Mike Rowe said in his recent TED Talk, "'Follow your passion' is probably the worst advice I ever got." I love it, but god do I hate it sometimes. Mommas, don't let your babies grow up to be actors. No matter how much they idolize that glorious bastard Edmund Kean.

Famed classical actor Edmund Kean (1787-1833) in a portrait painted shortly before his untimely death from complications from a hangnail that went untreated when his Equity health insurance ran out.

-- The Prolix Wag
Putting the "money" in "regional theatre actor"-- oh, right. There is no money in that.

Friday, July 24, 2009

How to Adapt Anything Into Anything

The absolute best movie adaptation of one of Shakespeare's works is, bar none, no doubt, gainsay-me-and-I'll-smack-you-in-the-mouth certain, Akira Kurosawa's Ran.

I'm certain there will be some Branagh-sniffers out there who will whine about his Henry V or (god forbid) his Hamlet, but there are always mouth-breathing philistines in any debate, no matter how obvious the outcome. Don't get me wrong, I love me some Branagh, but everyone knows the list of Best Shakespeare Movies goes like this:

1) Ran
2) Throne of Blood
3) Olivier's Henry V
4) MacKellan's Richard III
5) Olivier's Richard III
6) Scotland, PA
7) West Side Story
8) 10 Things I Hate About You
9) Strange Brew (It's an adaptation of Hamlet -- look it up.)
10) Anything by Kenneth Branagh. Except Hamlet. Because that sucked.

Well, everybody knows that, of course. But what a lot of people don't get is why Ran is so freaking fantastic, so incredibly successful in capturing the essence of King Lear on film. Well, here's why:

Because the whole damn thing is in Japanese. And therefore doesn't contain a lick of Shakespeare's dialogue.

(This is known in some circles as the "Baz Luhrmann's Romeo + Juliet would have been an awesome silent movie" rule.)

The mistake most people make when adapting something from one medium to another is that they base the adaptation on the surface elements of the original work; the shiny-pretties that strike a casual reader/viewer/audience member as "cool". The problem is, what works in one medium seldom works in another.

Shakespeare is a prime example. As I noted in First Thing We Do, Let's Kill All the English Majors, blank verse works like gangbusters on stage. Don't know why, but it does. It soars, it flies, it takes off like a giant goddamn bird if you deliver it right. On screen? On the page? Blechy-blechitty-blech-blech. Utter crap.

Similarly, giant explosions (preferably with the hero and his sidekick jumping to safety in slow motion in front of them) work wonderfully on screen. On stage? On the page? Yeah, not so much.

Which is why Kurosawa's decision to jettison all the dialogue in King Lear was key to making his film so damn brilliant. He turns the daughters into sons! Regan and Goneril are one guy! There's a freaky buddhist nun that you're all, like, "What the fuck?" about, but by god, it's LEAR. It's more LEAR than any other LEAR has ever been. The essence of the play is there, in spades.

"That's right, bitches! Hundreds of color coded samurai! Giant burning castle! It's all in the first folio -- look it up!"

Watching Ran won't tell you a thing about how to stage Lear, or how to read a particular line in the play, but you will get what that play is about. You will get King Lear. And it's just a flat-out amazing movie.

So, for all those movie execs eying Green Lantern and World of Warcraft and salivating, I present the Three Steps To Adapting Anything to Anything:

1) Determine the Essential Thing That Makes the Original Awesome

In other words, figure out What it does. What sets this work of art apart from every other... why this work was worth creating in the first place. It very seldom has much to do with the surface things that most people would notice about the work at first glance. What makes it fun? What makes it compelling? What makes it moving? Star Wars isn't about lightsabers and exploding Death Stars. MacBeth isn't about witches and swordfights. Moby Dick isn't about a goddamn whale.

As we all know, the Essential Thing That Made The Golden Compass Awesome was the nuanced allegorical examination of religion from a humanist standpoint, standing in opposition to C.S. Lewis's Chronicles of Narn--BEARS! BEARSBEARSBEARS!!! BEARS IN ARMOR! DURRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!

2) Determine how the effect was originally created.

In other words, figure out How it does it. Star Wars isn't about lightsabers and exploding Death Stars, but those were important means to an end. To adapt a movie, you have to understand cinematic structure and how camera angles can build tension. To adapt a play, you have to understand how language works in a live space. You don't have to be able to do what the creator did in their original medium, but you have to be able to see the wires that made Peter Pan fly.

3) Use the tools of your own medium to achieve the same effect.

In other words, Do what it did, but not in the same way. Use your mastery of your own chosen medium to create the same artistic effect with the things that work in your medium. Don't try and re-create the old work in the new medium... you're not going to make a movie of Huckleberry Finn that's a better novel than the original one was. But you can make a great movie out of it.

Every bad adaptation that's ever been made can be traced to a failure in one of these three areas, and every great adaptation has hit on all three. Bear this in mind as you go forth to create.

Remember: Only you can prevent... whatever the hell this was.

Oh, and if you meet Uwe Boll on a road? Kill him. Please.

-- The Prolix Wag
This is why I only read The Smurfs in the original French.

Sunday, July 5, 2009

Color Me Jealous

...and not just because she looks great in a BSG costume. Watch this:



Okay, now register the fact that this young woman is fifteen years old. FIFTEEN. Now watch it again.

I mean, Jesus.

How the hell are you supposed to maintain any kind of the-world-doesn't-deserve-me cockiness as a performer in the face of that?

It's not that I'm jealous of her talent, or her comic timing, or her writing skill, or any of that... they're substantial, but I can match or better her. With close to twenty years on her I damn well better be able to.

But her sense of self-possession is incredible. "If you think I make you feel weird now, wait until you're sixteen?" Who the hell comes up with something that full of genius at that age?

She knows who she is, and she owns it, completely. I've probably came to know the geography of who I was at her age, or thereabouts, and have thoroughly loathed vast tracts of it ever since. It took me years (decades, really) to get around to writing a play; not because I didn't know I had something to say, or that I didn't know it would be good, but because I was afraid other people wouldn't like it.

Same story with this blog, really. I should have started this thing years ago. I know I have a unique way of looking at the world, and that I'm inCREDibly smart and funny and, let's face it, sexy, but I still (at the tender age of thirty-four) can't quite convince myself that other people will agree with my assessment, or be interested in what I have to say.

Fortunately, she's not a guy, so I can be jealous without totally wanting to de-throat her. The ecology of overlapping types, and all that.

-- The Prolix Wag
Putting the “sense” in “sense of entitlement”.

UPDATE: She's 22. Topless Robot lied to me. I'm still jealous.